http://www.london2012.com/

What a disgrace...

Just about 99% of users on this forum, which have a copy of Photoshop, and actually know how to use could have made better than that.

And, to top that off, they paid 400,000 £ for it!

2 words,

OH DEAR!!!!!!

wow, just wow.

That's insane. Way too much money for that site.

^ Yup. It's called marketing my friend :)

2 :D 1 2 <- my design, do i get money now?

That's better than theres. :P

Beijing and Vancouver > London for sure. Although overall, I do prefer Vancouver.

I like the Vancouver one too. But it looks a little childish.

I kind of like it. It screams 60s British Invasion, Beatles, Rolling Stones, Peace... maybe that's just me. It's abstract. I mean, sure, it's waaaaay too much money. But I like the look.

It doesn't look sportish at all.

I think I'm blind.

that's disgustingly hideous.

I disagree. They're both horrendous.

I like this one:

http://www.spudart.org/blog/images/2006/20...ympics-logo.gif

The Chicago 2016 one that has been made looks great but they might be forced to change it. A ruling by the committee behind the Olympics declared that no logo is allowed to use the torch in its design otherwise a new logo must be made.

That one is way nicer yeah :(

Yeah I like that one Roi.

Thats amazing! My kid could have done a lot better then that with a crayon and a piece of paper.